Bionicdodge.Com
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 03, 2010, 02:33:27 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Check out the complete Mopar parts lists online by clicking HERE
76540 Posts in 9429 Topics by 1626 Members
Latest Member: RUNVS
* Home Help Search Gallery Calendar Login Register
Bionicdodge.Com  |  Bionic Tech  |  3.9/5.2/5.9 (Moderators: janesy, JoelC707, mpp97sst, 98Dak408)  |  Topic: Edelbrock Air Gap Dyno 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Edelbrock Air Gap Dyno  (Read 1221 times)
msdnga
Bionic Master
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2191



« on: August 16, 2007, 04:22:44 PM »

Well, I tested the new manifold using all the Hughes  supplied parts. I removed my 2bbl M1 and 55TB, ran the new setup and gained......



nothing.

Still 341hp and 383 ft lbs. I am sure with a bigger cam, it will shine.
Test was done on a 408 10.3 comp, R/T heads ported, 210/220 108 cam, Pacesetters.

Again, nothing....sad day on the dyno.
Logged

Marty
Proverbs 16:3
Kandahar, Afghanistan
98Dak408
Site Donor
Global Moderator
Bionic Supremacist
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3444



WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2007, 04:45:53 PM »

Before I put my engine together I thought about the concept of the airgap manifold.  It remiinds me of the old school dual plane manifold and the M1 reminds me of the old school torker.  With a bigger cam, wouldn't you still be better off with the M1?
Logged

1998 Dakota  R/T CC; 408 Stroker; KRC 220/230, SCT; Ported Eddy’s; M1; HiPoTek 53.6 mm TB; MP Headers; Single 3 1/2" Exhaust; Transgo; PATC 2800; Motive 4.56; Auburn LSD; Hotchkis TVS - 2/3 Drop; Sidewinder Customs 13" Viper Brakes; HiPoTek X-Brace, Driveshaft Loops, Engine Torque Strap, and Differential Cover.



Thank you for looking, Richard
msdnga
Bionic Master
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2191



« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2007, 04:49:57 PM »

I was hoping the TQ would have hit 400, but nothing. I'll try putting a 4bbl Comp TB on it next before doing a camshaft and redyno.
Logged

Marty
Proverbs 16:3
Kandahar, Afghanistan
RATTLER360
Bionic Senior
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 448


« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2007, 05:02:20 PM »

marty what do you think of the hughes 2228 cam
Logged
msdnga
Bionic Master
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2191



« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2007, 06:06:23 PM »

Not a fan off 114 LSA's
Logged

Marty
Proverbs 16:3
Kandahar, Afghanistan
SmokinMirror
Bionic Junior
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 229


m@n !$ oBs0Le+e


« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2007, 11:54:30 PM »

I expected it to be less power; I thought the Idea was that it made more power at the lower RPMs than the M1 without losing so much high end unlike the kegger...  (Or making almost kegger low end with much more top end)….  Better yet, what about comparing the dyno charts at the mid/low RPMs?



*I just remembered, a while back someone showed the the M1 didn’t lose torque compared to the kegger on the (dyno) but that is obviously false in real world tests.

After researching this stuff for as long as I have now, I don’t trust dynos. Obviously I also don’t know a fraction of what you kids do though.

« Last Edit: August 16, 2007, 11:58:25 PM by SmokinMirror » Logged

bad360rt
Bionic Junior
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 221



WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2007, 01:45:37 AM »

Did the powerband change at all?  Can we see both dyno sheets?  Doesn't affect my setup, I'm going with an Indy intake, I'm just curious Smile
Logged

'02 FR RC R/T
425/W5/nitrous setup coming soon
msdnga
Bionic Master
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2191



« Reply #7 on: August 17, 2007, 01:58:27 AM »

Sure, I will post. The numbers where actually 2 off less, but the same peak rpm, peak TQ. No change in the powerband or how it responds on the street. Thats why I did the dyno to see what TQ gains would be affected, could care less about the peak HP.

Tell the Delphi boys making comments, that no GSC/PPH header ever compared to the Ram Pacesetter 1 3/4 long tubes either.  I went from 460tq with a LT  1 5/8 Hooker Header to 492tq by changing to this header on the DTS dyno.

Back on topic, no change anywhere in the powerband compared to a untouched M-1 2bbl.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2007, 02:38:21 AM by msdnga » Logged

Marty
Proverbs 16:3
Kandahar, Afghanistan
mtlcafan79
Bionic Senior
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 636


WWW
« Reply #8 on: August 17, 2007, 02:48:54 AM »

Does it still magically gain you half a second at the track? lol...
Logged

99 RC 5.9 TKO600
mopowar
Bionic Newbie

Offline Offline

Posts: 84


« Reply #9 on: August 17, 2007, 03:58:39 AM »

I think they gained .5 over a stock kegger. On a obd2 dyno anyway.

Thanks Marty. You just saved me $722.
Logged

2009 Ram 1500 Sport
K&N Drop-in
msdnga
Bionic Master
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2191



« Reply #10 on: August 17, 2007, 05:29:05 AM »

This may not be a fair comparison on a stock engine. But I was really hoping to gain 20 ft lbs and 4-5 hp over the M-1.
Logged

Marty
Proverbs 16:3
Kandahar, Afghanistan
SmokinMirror
Bionic Junior
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 229


m@n !$ oBs0Le+e


« Reply #11 on: August 17, 2007, 10:17:55 AM »

Thanks for the clarification Marty.

hey bad360rt, I didnt know indy made one... I'll have to check it out
Logged

RATTLER360
Bionic Senior
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 448


« Reply #12 on: August 17, 2007, 03:24:31 PM »

indy makes a manifold for us?
Logged
SmokinMirror
Bionic Junior
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 229


m@n !$ oBs0Le+e


« Reply #13 on: August 17, 2007, 04:27:17 PM »

Marty, Im confused about... GSC, DTS?? 
Logged

msdnga
Bionic Master
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 2191



« Reply #14 on: August 18, 2007, 07:58:59 AM »

Sorry, GSM header and DTS engine dyno.
Logged

Marty
Proverbs 16:3
Kandahar, Afghanistan
Bionicdodge.Com
Advertisement
Thanks to the following sponsor
   

 Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
Bionicdodge.Com  |  Bionic Tech  |  3.9/5.2/5.9 (Moderators: janesy, JoelC707, mpp97sst, 98Dak408)  |  Topic: Edelbrock Air Gap Dyno « previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!